Federal Waivers Cast Doubt on Starbase LA Environmental Promises

If you'd like, let me know:Which specific type of infrastructure project (highway, rail, aviation) you are followingWhether you need details on public comment changes or legal challengesI can provide more targeted information. DOT plan would cut environmental reviews from years to months

Help support this website by becoming a paid member

Federal Waivers Cast Doubt on Starbase LA Environmental Promises DOT plan would cut environmental reviews from years to months

Artist’s conception of Starbase Louisiana. Credit: SpaceX

As SpaceX’s prepares to build the world’s largest spaceport on 125,000 acres of Louisiana land and marshes, Elon Musk’s company and state officials are saying all the right things about protecting the fragile coastal environment and the wildlife that live there.

Louisiana’s coast is disappearing at one of the fastest rates in the country. We’re working with state and federal agencies, landowners, and conservation groups to protect shoreline, restore wetlands, and support the wildlife and recreation that depend on them.
— SpaceX (Link)

“The project will go through all applicable environmental, wetlands, natural resource and launch-related reviews…From regulated activities related to site development to voluntary restoration plans across the entire property, the company has sought the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s (CPRA) input and guidance at every stage.”
— Louisiana Economic Development (Link — FAQ Section)

That all sounds great. However, the phrase “all applicable environmental, wetlands, natural resource and launch-related reviews” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement. The fact is, there are about to be a lot fewer reviews.

In late July, the Trump Administration announced plans to waive all or parts of 13 federal laws “applicable to licenses to operate a launch site, licenses to operate a reentry site, experimental permits, and licenses to operate launch and reentry vehicles.” Specifically, the administration wants to waive the following laws:

42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA);
49 U.S.C. § 303(f) U.S. Department of Transportation Act;
16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. Endangered Species Act;
33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. Clean Water Act;
16 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq. Coastal Zone Management Act;
42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. Clean Air Act;
54 U.S.C. §§ 300101 et seq. National Historic Preservation Act;
16 U.S.C. §§ 1361 et seq. Marine Mammal Protection Act;
16 U.S.C. §§ 1801 et seq. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act;
16 U.S.C. §§ 1271 et seq. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act;
42 U.S.C. §§ 4901 et seq. Noise Control Act of 1972;
33 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. Rivers and Harbors Act; and
16 U.S.C. § 1431 et seq. National Marine Sanctuaries Act.

The period for public comment closed on Aug. 31. You can read the comments here.

Department of Transportation (DOT) officials said the waivers would allow the United States to win Space Race 2.0 with China by removing regulations hindering the development of space.

“America won the first Space Race, and we can do it again — but only if we get government red tape out of the way. That’s why President Trump has charged USDOT with unlocking the final frontier and re-establishing the United States’ dominance in space,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy said in a press release. “Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, we are supercharging commercial space activity, slashing costs, and strengthening America’s competitive edge in this vital field.”

The waivers would reward SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who spent nearly $300 million on the last election supporting Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The world’s richest man is reported to be planning to spend as much as $200 million on the midterm elections to ensure Republicans maintain control of Congress.

More broadly, the waivers are part of President Donald Trump’s larger project to dismantle many of the federal environmental, safety and health regulations put in place by previous presidents and Congresses to protect the country and its 342 million citizens.

Starship lifts off from Starbase in Texas. Credit: SpaceX

The Impact

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that the Trump Administration wants to waive would require an environmental impact statement (EIS) on Starbase Louisiana. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would be the lead agency producing the EIS.

Various federal agencies would evaluate the plan for compliance with the Clean Air, Clean Water, Endangered Species, Noise Control and other applicable federal statutes. In other words, the very laws the Trump Administration wants to waive.

The EIS would lay out how Starbase Louisiana would impact the site and stipulate actions that SpaceX would need to take to mitigate harmful effects. The EIS would be released to the public for comment before the FAA could render a final decision on the project.

An EIS was required when SpaceX wanted to launch Falcon 9 rockets from Starbase (Boca Chica) in Texas. The document ran to 1,576 pages in three volumes. The FAA began the process in April 2012 and completed it 26 months later in June 2014. The agency then issued a finding of no significant impact that allowed the project to go forward.

SpaceX later changed its plans to launch the much larger and more powerful Starship/Super Heavy rocket from Starbase. A less rigorous programmatic environmental assessment (PEA) was required before the FAA approved the revised plan. The PEA took 19 months to complete. The assessment required SpaceX to take more than 75 actions to mitigate the impact of Starship on the environment.

Starship in space during Flight 11. Credit: SpaceX

The Opposition

A complete waiver of NEPA and the related environmental acts would likely save SpaceX because no EIS would be required.

“I would say it is probable that they would try to [completely waive NEPA]. Just noting that I doubt that all 13 laws would apply to building of the spaceport, but those that are likely to apply I assume they will try to waive those laws there,” Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biodiversity, wrote in an email.

“We strongly oppose the proposal [waivers] and believe it is illegal and that we can overturn [it] eventually in court. It is pretty clear that it only benefits two companies and two billionaire/trillionaires. It is payback for services rendered by both Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk,” Hartl added.

The Louisiana Wildlife Federation, National Wildlife Federation, and Pontchartrain Conservancy opposed the waivers in a six-page letter the organizations jointly submitted to the FAA during the public comment period last month.

“The central flaw in the proposal is its confusion of process with substance. Removing NEPA and its companion statutes from the licensing stage does not make the environmental impacts of a spaceport disappear,” the letter stated. “The marsh is filled either way. The birds are displaced either way. The wetlands are lost either way. What the waiver removes is the requirement to identify those impacts, quantify them, disclose them to the public, and consider alternatives and mitigation before the damage is done.”

“Environmental review of the SpaceX facility at Boca Chica, Texas [Starbase], an ecologically comparable coastal site adjacent to a national wildlife refuge, identified significant impacts to habitat and protected species, and the company was separately penalized in 2024 for Clean Water Act violations at that facility. Those are exactly the outcomes that project-level review exists to identify and prevent. Removing the review would not have prevented the impacts at Boca Chica; it would only have prevented anyone from documenting them beforehand,” the letter added.

The three environmental groups made recommendations on how the FAA should move forward on evaluating Starbase Louisiana.

Withdraw the proposed categorical waivers for NEPA, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
Retain project-level NEPA review including Environmental Impact Statements where appropriate.
Retain project-level environmental review for commercial space actions affecting fish, wildlife and habitats.
Retain Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation for all commercial space actions, given the presence of endangered species in and around active and proposed launch sites.
Limit any waiver authority to genuine, documented national-security necessity on a case-by-case basis with a specific written finding.
Retain Clean Water Act and Coastal Zone Management Act review for launch facilities proposed in coastal wetlands.
Conduct a programmatic environmental review of the cumulative effects of the projected growth in commercial launch operations before finalizing any rule that would remove project-level review.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) is now sorting through the public comments it received before finalizing any actions on the waivers.

I’ve reproduced the environmental protection claims from the SpaceX and Louisiana state websites below.

SpaceX Website

https://www.spacex.com/sites/starbase-la

Protecting and restoring

Louisiana’s coast is disappearing at one of the fastest rates in the country. We’re working with state and federal agencies, landowners, and conservation groups to protect shoreline, restore wetlands, and support the wildlife and recreation that depend on them.

Restoring the shoreline

In Vermilion Parish, the shoreline is eroding between 3.3 and 23 feet per year. We’re partnering with state and federal agencies to expand Louisiana’s Coastal Master Plan and Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act projects, including Gulf shoreline protection breakwaters designed to reduce wave energy and slow loss along the Gulf edge.

Rebuilding the marshlands

In working with the state, we’re planning thousands of acres of marsh creation using beneficial-use placement of dredged material and offshore sediment sources. Restoration will also include interior marsh bank stabilization and rebuilding marsh in remnant canals. These projects can reconnect fragmented wetlands, restore natural buffers against storms, and return habitat that has been lost to erosion and historic canalization.

Preserving coastal wildlife

Pecan Island and nearby wetlands are high-value habitat for migratory waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and other coastal wildlife. SpaceX is not developing the full footprint of the land and will preserve wetlands and wildlife habitat. At existing launch sites, waterfowl and other birds continue to use nearby habitat during operations. Working with wildlife agencies, landowners, and conservation groups, SpaceX will support monitoring and management so this habitat stays productive and hunting, fishing, birding, and other recreational activities that are part of this coast’s culture can continue.

Louisiana State Website

https://www.opportunitylouisiana.gov/spacex (FAQ Section)

Permitting & Regulatory Oversight

SpaceX is working with the federal, state and local agencies responsible for permitting and regulatory review.
The project will go through all applicable environmental, wetlands, natural resource and launch-related reviews.
Each regulatory agency retains independent authority over the permits and approvals within its jurisdiction

Coastal & Environmental Protection

From regulated activities related to site development to voluntary restoration plans across the entire property, the company has sought the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s (CPRA) input and guidance at every stage.
SpaceX is proactively working with CPRA to evaluate opportunities for improved hydrology, habitat restoration, shoreline stabilization and long-term management of the property.
The currently proposed development area does not affect any active CPRA restoration projects.
If not for this project, the projected level of investment in CPRA-related projects and total number of acres being restored, enhanced and protected for future generations would not be achievable.

Wildlife & Fisheries

SpaceX is proactively working with the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF) (opens external page in a new window) and other appropriate agencies to identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate potential impacts to wildlife, fisheries and habitat.
Unavoidable wetlands impacts must be fully mitigated by the company.

You're currently a free subscriber to Douglas’s Substack. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid