If you think Range Rover listens to it's customers I have some sand in South Florida to sell you 🤣agenda 2030 .. the goal is complete electronic geo-fenced vehicles that can be remote controlled under the guise of "innovation"
COMMENTS
- Well well LR, clearly your customers have more money then sense, I dunno who would wanna sit in that miserable minimlist interior design, steering wheel looks rubbish, its horrid. Also the overall greenhouse design of the exterior is very odd with the falloff rear. The two guys chattin' sound as enthusiastic as Jags PR team lol😅......Reserving judgement till final production model, but not my cup of tea. 😮
- My 1974 Series III will take on anything off road, this thing will not. My Series III will outlast me, this thing will die after 20.000 miles. My Series III can be repaired at home with a tool kit and a repair manual, this thing will sit in the dealer with five "experts" with an iPad trying to figure out what´s wrong. My Series III will run on home made biodiesel, this thing will lose and los autonomy each year passed. My Series III is 52 years old at the moment, this thing won´t make it to 5. My Series III sits seven people, can carry my German Sheperd, carry half a house inside, this thing barely seems to have space for two bags in the back.
Why would I ever want to even be next to this vehicle which, just as many of your cars these last years, is not worthy of the Land Rover name???
- I’ve owned two Range Rovers, an Evoque and a top-of-the-line SV Ultra, and neither experience left me impressed. So why should I believe the new GT will be any different? What has actually changed to justify giving Range Rover a third chance?
I’m not interested in marketing promises, fancy interiors, or impressive specifications on paper. I want to see proven reliability, genuine build quality, and long-term dependability in real-world conditions.
Talk is cheap. Prove it on the road, over years of ownership, not during a carefully staged press launch. I’ve already been disappointed twice, and at this price point, Range Rover has nothing left to prove with words. It needs to prove itself through the ownership experience.
Why should I risk my time and money a third time?
- I thought the range RoverVelar was poorly designed ! this new range Rover looks hideous. It looks like it’s had its back end chopped off. I’ll guarantee 100% this particular new model will be costly as anyone in the right mind will stay away from the dealership.
- These car companies are giving less for more money...a stupid consumer base keeps subsidising them by buying this crap....these guys only understand the bottom line....dont buy this stuff....they quickly go back and give us something better.
- This is what the velar should have been 5 years ago when high priced electric cars mattered. This is basically a sister to the jaguar type 01 in its underpinnings. JLR is hedging its bets that the type 01 will be successful and this will help absorb the financial blow from its certain losses and repurpose the development costs put into that car into the more profitable brand.
- It’s a car nobody asked with a totally inappropriate badge and brand that dilutes that brand. Besides which its interior looks very like a cheaper version of a Leapmotor or X-Peng. What the heck has gone wrong at JLR?
- Disaster. Complete disaster. Ugly interior made to be "more like chinese leaders" and NOT for me definetally. And yes - they took i-Pace concept and called it RangeRover. And made it look like compkete disaster. Im JLR guy since 1998. But now im quit. Enougph is enougph.
- This brand now is just a brand disguised as a brand within a brand. Lost in translation and meaning. It's no longer the Range Rover, Land Rover, nor the Road Rover. It is empty in existence. No longer a luxury SUV. Shame what no innovation can do you a once promising strong brand.
LISTEN ORGINAL NEWS
- Well well LR, clearly your customers have more money then sense, I dunno who would wanna sit in that miserable minimlist interior design, steering wheel looks rubbish, its horrid. Also the overall greenhouse design of the exterior is very odd with the falloff rear. The two guys chattin' sound as enthusiastic as Jags PR team lol😅......Reserving judgement till final production model, but not my cup of tea. 😮
- My 1974 Series III will take on anything off road, this thing will not. My Series III will outlast me, this thing will die after 20.000 miles. My Series III can be repaired at home with a tool kit and a repair manual, this thing will sit in the dealer with five "experts" with an iPad trying to figure out what´s wrong. My Series III will run on home made biodiesel, this thing will lose and los autonomy each year passed. My Series III is 52 years old at the moment, this thing won´t make it to 5. My Series III sits seven people, can carry my German Sheperd, carry half a house inside, this thing barely seems to have space for two bags in the back.
Why would I ever want to even be next to this vehicle which, just as many of your cars these last years, is not worthy of the Land Rover name???
- I’ve owned two Range Rovers, an Evoque and a top-of-the-line SV Ultra, and neither experience left me impressed. So why should I believe the new GT will be any different? What has actually changed to justify giving Range Rover a third chance?
I’m not interested in marketing promises, fancy interiors, or impressive specifications on paper. I want to see proven reliability, genuine build quality, and long-term dependability in real-world conditions.
Talk is cheap. Prove it on the road, over years of ownership, not during a carefully staged press launch. I’ve already been disappointed twice, and at this price point, Range Rover has nothing left to prove with words. It needs to prove itself through the ownership experience.
Why should I risk my time and money a third time?
- I thought the range RoverVelar was poorly designed ! this new range Rover looks hideous. It looks like it’s had its back end chopped off. I’ll guarantee 100% this particular new model will be costly as anyone in the right mind will stay away from the dealership.
- These car companies are giving less for more money...a stupid consumer base keeps subsidising them by buying this crap....these guys only understand the bottom line....dont buy this stuff....they quickly go back and give us something better.
- This is what the velar should have been 5 years ago when high priced electric cars mattered. This is basically a sister to the jaguar type 01 in its underpinnings. JLR is hedging its bets that the type 01 will be successful and this will help absorb the financial blow from its certain losses and repurpose the development costs put into that car into the more profitable brand.
- It’s a car nobody asked with a totally inappropriate badge and brand that dilutes that brand. Besides which its interior looks very like a cheaper version of a Leapmotor or X-Peng. What the heck has gone wrong at JLR?
- Disaster. Complete disaster. Ugly interior made to be "more like chinese leaders" and NOT for me definetally. And yes - they took i-Pace concept and called it RangeRover. And made it look like compkete disaster. Im JLR guy since 1998. But now im quit. Enougph is enougph.
- This brand now is just a brand disguised as a brand within a brand. Lost in translation and meaning. It's no longer the Range Rover, Land Rover, nor the Road Rover. It is empty in existence. No longer a luxury SUV. Shame what no innovation can do you a once promising strong brand.
Posts
0 Comments